Once upon a time, a natural sort of affirmative action existed, one that has become extinct, unfortunately. When the wealthy got comfortable, their bodies became weak through disuse, overnutrition, undernutrition and cocaine. The lower-class became strong through their hard work, and this would occasionally allow them to ooze above the upper crust.
Diseases such as beri-beri, anemia and pellagra were caused by consumption of fancy polished grains (white rice, white bread, etc), which were once available only to the wealthy. The industrial revolution slowly brought the privilege of these problems to the masses (now, the FDA requires fortification of refined grains, so these epidemics have become rare). In addition to undernutrition, many of the wealthy suffered from overnutrition - becoming fat and sluggish through overindulgence. The proletariat remained lean and mean.
Cocaine (and many other recreational drugs) used to be available only to the rich. It’s use as a recreational drug (in powder form) goes back to the 1860s. It was common for nobility to grow long fingernails on their pinky fingers to snort the stuff. So, as soon as the wealthy stopped having malnutrition, they had cocaine.
But as of the 1980s, a chemical and marketing product mix known as crack came about, and now for once cocaine gained the ability to ruin poor peoples’ lives too. Oh yeah, and through farm subsidies and new technology, food is really cheap, meaning the poor are just as vulnerable as the rich of obesity. Thank you, McDonald’s!
So, are there, or will there be in the future, any natural forms of affirmative action? That is, are there phenomenon that naturally equalize situations where class might otherwise be a noose people are born in? Avoid the obvious answers (complacency). Discuss…
Tags: affirmative action, anemia, beri-beri, class, cocaine, crack, drugs, nutrition, pellagra
Well I suppose that it’s true that these things made the rich & poor’s lives suck equally, it didn’t necessarily work as affirmative action. A king couldn’t eat or coke himself up into being a pauper, nor could the pauper move up in class by eating whole grains. Their genes may have gone on to other generations, being healthy and healthy enough to be strong breeders but disease still hit the poor more than the rich. I think if you look at the morbidly obese today, they are probably much more sick than the rich were back in the day.
As far as drug use, it’s about as old as man, and that being said, so is prostitution. Prostitution afforded many people the drugs that were favorites of the upper classes, no high class status required. In this case genes weren’t as likely to be passed on due to high mortality rate of their children.
I think if in the past minority groups were placed in better positions due to some environmental or social climate (rather than laws like today) it would be that sex is the workin’ man’s entertainment and having many children (who were working) afforded a poor family more than they would have otherwise. Also it would give them more opportunity to have daughters marry into wealth and help the family step up the social latter some. We certainly don’t have that today!
Maybe your response was a little “foody” oriented, lol!